So there seems to be a common misconception among guys out there. And it has to do with length.
No, not the length of their schlongs (I’ve already addressed that in “The Myth of Moby Dick”) but the length of the sexy time.
I’m a hit it and quit it type of girl — I like it hard, fast and wet. But some guys think a girl wants slow romantic sex that lasts for hours!
Once I had sex for about 16 hours straight — of course we did it with the aid of pharmaceuticals — but after an all-night sex sesh, not only did I emerge from the room with the biggest beard burn you’ve ever seen (I looked like I had a chin herpe), but a bangover that lasted for days.
Now, I’m not saying I want a 60 second man, but I like a guy who comes hard and then cums hard in about 10 minutes.
I absolutely agree! I am not a slow romantic type girl. If a guy can't give me hard and nasty, I will shove him aside and break out the vibe and show him how hard I need it. Either catch on or move along!
June 24, 2010 @ 11:16 am
Bangover, love it. Well, for some reason starting slow and romantical "gets me going" but after a few minutes I'm ready to go! And yeah, it need not last more than 15 minutes. And 16 HOURS?! Are you serious? Hello UTIs from hell!
June 25, 2010 @ 3:06 pm
Bangover is my new favorite word – thanks! I actually used it yesterday as I told one of my friends why I had called in sick to work – needed serious recoop time after that one!
June 30, 2010 @ 4:33 pm
I would like to thank Heather for this post. You are the reason why I got fucked so hard this past weekend. My fuck buddy learned a new word from this page, and decided it was what’s what I was going to get. A bangover.
April 9, 2012 @ 9:57 pm
You’re welcome — it’s what I’m here for!
April 13, 2012 @ 12:16 am